jira-alerts-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jira-alerts-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive Opsgenie alert management including listing, creating, acknowledging, and closing alerts, as well as managing alert notes, logs, and custom properties through natural language.214 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables PagerDuty incident response operations including listing incidents, acknowledging and resolving incidents, looking up on-call schedules, and listing services.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables issue search, creation, updates, comments, status transitions, and project listing in Jira, purpose-built for security incident management and SOC workflows.918 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Opsgenie (Atlassian's incident/alert management and on-call platform) exposing the full public Opsgenie REST API as MCP tools.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables interaction with Atlassian Jira and Confluence via their REST API, providing tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and retrieving issues, pages, projects, and spaces.1410 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables incident management and on-call operations for the All Quiet platform, allowing MCP clients to triage incidents, check who is on call, and access the full public API through generic tools.10MIT
TDQS
Scored across 28 tools
The surface is large but the descriptions carefully draw boundaries: notes vs logs vs extra properties vs tags, acknowledge vs close vs snooze vs escalate, and get_on_call vs get_next_on_call vs get_schedule_timeline are all explicitly contrasted. A few pairs (jsm_add_alert_note vs jsm_add_alert_extra_properties, jsm_add_alert_tags vs jsm_add_alert_extra_properties) could still be momentarily confused, but the docs resolve it.
Every tool uses the consistent jsm_ prefix followed by verb_noun in snake_case (jsm_list_alerts, jsm_update_alert_note, jsm_get_on_call). The pattern is uniform across alerts, notes, tags, properties, and scheduling families with no deviations in casing or style.
28 tools is heavy for a single server, sitting above the comfortable 3-15 band. The breadth reflects a genuinely large API (alerts plus on-call scheduling plus a capability-introspection tool), so each tool has a real purpose, but the count is borderline and increases selection burden.
Coverage is strong: full alert lifecycle (create/get/list/update/ack/close/snooze/escalate/delete), note CRUD, tags and extra-properties add/remove, responder addition, async verification, and schedule/on-call reads. The main gap is the inability to remove a responder, and there is no listing of teams/escalation policies/users that some write tools (escalation_id, responder_id) would benefit from.