delete_table_row

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool deletes a row and returns a success/error message, without mentioning side effects (e.g., permanent modification) or any constraints like required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with no superfluous text. It front-loads the core purpose and uses a clean format for arguments. Minor improvement could include structuring with headings, but overall it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (two integer parameters, no nested objects) and the presence of an output schema, the description is mostly adequate but lacks mention of whether the deletion is permanent or if any confirmation is needed. It also doesn't distinguish from the similar sibling 'remove_table_row'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds crucial meaning to both parameters: 'table_index' is 0-based and 'row_index' identifies the row to delete. This compensates for the schema having 0% description coverage, where only titles exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete a row from a table') and the resource ('a row'). It is specific and easily distinguishes the tool's purpose from siblings like 'remove_table_row', though no explicit differentiation is needed for purpose clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives such as 'remove_table_row' or 'edit_table_cell'. It lacks context about prerequisites, typical use cases, or whether deletion is reversible.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.