Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FREOA Verifica

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Brazilian legal practitioners to search and verify case law, súmulas, and federal legislation against official sources, and to audit entire draft documents citation by citation with source provenance, collection dates, and verification status. Every response carries its own verification flag so a failed source lookup never silently becomes "no results", and citations blocked by anti-bot protections are returned as pending manual review with an official search link.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Verifiable German, Austrian, Swiss and EU law: resolve citations to the wording in force, verify the citations a model produced against the official source, and walk the citation graph.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic, read-only retrieval of authoritative EU legal materials, including legislation, case law, and EDPB/EDPS documents, with exact text, structural identifiers, and provenance.
      16
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search, outcome prediction, and legal document drafting across 67M+ Brazilian court decisions from 55 tribunals, with tools for jurimetric analysis and citation verification.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources: three source-specific searches (legislacao/cvm/bcb), three retrieval tools (dispositivo/decisao/evidencia), and two verification tools (citacao/texto). The main soft spot is that buscar_legislacao could be seen as overlapping with buscar_normas_cvm/bcb since it also queries official connectors, and obter_dispositivo vs obter_evidencia require careful reading to separate. Descriptions do clarify the boundaries well enough to avoid most misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a strong verb_noun Portuguese pattern (buscar_*, obter_*, verificar_*, pesquisar_*, listar_*). The only deviation is historico_dispositivo, which is a noun phrase rather than a verb-led name, and buscar_normas_cvm/bcb add a source suffix inconsistently vs buscar_legislacao. Overall predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each earns its place, covering search, resolution, retrieval, verification, history, and source listing. No redundant or filler tools are apparent.

    Completeness4/5

    The verification lifecycle is well covered: search sources, resolve citations, fetch provisions/decisions/evidence, check history, and verify against official captures, plus a source-health tool. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit cross-version comparison or batch export, but core agent workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues