FREOA Verifica
Related Servers
Alternatives to FREOA Verifica
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Brazilian legal practitioners to search and verify case law, súmulas, and federal legislation against official sources, and to audit entire draft documents citation by citation with source provenance, collection dates, and verification status. Every response carries its own verification flag so a failed source lookup never silently becomes "no results", and citations blocked by anti-bot protections are returned as pending manual review with an official search link.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying Brazilian federal legislation from official Planalto, Câmara, and Senado sources, including article text, metadata, amendments, and revocation history. It also checks article-level validity by cross-referencing sources and flagging divergences.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Brazilian case law search across 17 courts, returning exact matching excerpts, official court links, and optional full-text access for decisions.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables querying Portuguese legislation, including statutes, provisions, and EU law implementations, with tools for search, citation validation, and currency checks.54 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching, reading, and citing Brazilian legislation from a local read-only corpus clone, with article-level retrieval, faceted counts, coverage gap checks, and signatory lookups.5MIT

kvasir-legalofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVerifiable German, Austrian, Swiss and EU law: resolve citations to the wording in force, verify the citations a model produced against the official source, and walk the citation graph.-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool has a distinct role in the pipeline (buscar → resolver → obter → historico → verificar → registro), and the descriptions explicitly state ordering and scope boundaries (e.g. verificar_citacao for a single citation vs verificar_texto for a whole draft; obter_decisao for jurisprudence vs obter_dispositivo for normative text). The main overlap is that buscar_legislacao already covers Planalto/CVM/BCB/Senado while buscar_normas_cvm and buscar_normas_bcb are source-specific near-duplicates, which an agent could misselect. Still, the specializations are explained, so confusion is limited.
Most names follow a Portuguese verb_noun pattern (obter_, buscar_, verificar_, resolver_, listar_) with a clear resource noun. Deviations are minor but real: 'historico_dispositivo' is noun-first rather than verb-first, and similar search operations use two different verbs ('buscar_legislacao'/'buscar_normas_cvm' vs 'pesquisar_jurisprudencia'). Readability remains high despite these inconsistencies.
13 tools is within a healthy range and each maps to a real step in legal research and anti-hallucination verification. A slight redundancy exists in having both the general buscar_legislacao and the two dedicated CVM/BCB search tools, which could plausibly be folded into one parameterized search.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: discovery (listar_fontes, pesquisar_jurisprudencia, buscar_legislacao), resolution and retrieval (resolver_citacao, obter_dispositivo, obter_decisao), provenance (obter_evidencia), history, verification (verificar_citacao, verificar_texto) and audit (obter_registro). Minor gaps: no explicit tool for comparing or exporting consolidated citations, and jurisprudence verification relies on obter_decisao plus evidence rather than a dedicated verify path.