update_table

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are given, so the description carries full burden. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as whether updates are destructive, what happens to existing data, or permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one sentence) but at the expense of completeness. It lacks structure and fails to convey essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 3 parameters, a nested object, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain return values, side effects, or how to construct the table object.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%. The description only mentions 'using a Sheets API Table object' but does not explain the 'table' parameter, 'fields', or 'spreadsheet_id' semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update a table' which is vague and almost tautological with the tool name. It does not specify what kind of table (e.g., Google Sheets table) or how it differs from sibling tools like 'add_table' or 'build_table'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.