security-get-domain
Retrieve all Sitecore domains to manage user access and security permissions across your content management system.
Instructions
Get all Sitecore domains.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all Sitecore domains to manage user access and security permissions across your content management system.
Get all Sitecore domains.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states this is a 'Get' operation but doesn't disclose whether this requires authentication, has rate limits, returns paginated results, or what format the domains are returned in. For a read operation with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant behavioral gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose with zero wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a simple retrieval tool with no parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read operation with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks important context. It doesn't explain what 'domains' means in Sitecore context, what format they're returned in, or whether this requires specific permissions. The absence of annotations and output schema means the description should do more to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly indicates no parameters are needed ('Get all...') without adding unnecessary parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('all Sitecore domains'), providing a specific verb+resource combination. However, it doesn't distinguish this tool from its sibling 'security-get-domain-by-name', which appears to retrieve a specific domain rather than all domains.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of the sibling tool 'security-get-domain-by-name' for retrieving specific domains, nor any context about prerequisites, permissions, or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ramseur/mcp-sitecore-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server