indexing-remove-search-index-item-by-id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It states this is a removal operation (destructive) but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether this requires specific permissions, if the removal is permanent or reversible, what happens to related data, or any rate limits. The mention of wildcard filtering adds some context but overall behavioral disclosure is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose and adds a useful detail about wildcard support. Every word serves a purpose with zero waste, making it appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive operation with no annotations and no output schema, the description is somewhat complete in stating what it does and a key parameter feature. However, it lacks details about the mutation's impact, error conditions, or return values, leaving gaps in understanding the full context of use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67% (2 of 3 parameters have descriptions). The description adds value by mentioning wildcard filtering for 'indexName', which isn't in the schema's description, but doesn't provide additional meaning for 'id' or 'path' beyond what the schema already documents. This meets the baseline for moderate schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Removes') and target resource ('the item with the specified ID from the search index'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'indexing-remove-search-index-item-by-path' which uses a path parameter instead of ID. It also mentions the unique capability of wildcard filtering for index names.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by specifying it removes items by ID, but doesn't explicitly state when to use this versus the path-based sibling tool or other indexing tools. It mentions wildcard filtering for index names, which provides some contextual guidance but lacks explicit alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.