presentation-remove-rendering-parameter-by-id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but offers minimal behavioral insight. It states a destructive action ('Removes') but doesn't clarify if this is reversible, what permissions are needed, or how the system responds. The description doesn't contradict annotations (none exist), but fails to provide essential context for a mutation operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized for its purpose and front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation tool with 6 parameters and no annotations or output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what happens after removal, potential side effects, error conditions, or relationship to other presentation tools. The context demands more comprehensive guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's already in the schema descriptions, maintaining the baseline score of 3 for adequate coverage through structured data alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Removes') and target ('the specified rendering parameter from the rendering placed on the item specified by ID'), making the purpose understandable. It doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'presentation-remove-rendering-parameter-by-path', but the naming convention implies the difference is ID vs path-based identification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'presentation-remove-rendering-parameter-by-path' or other presentation manipulation tools. It lacks context about prerequisites, appropriate scenarios, or what happens after removal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.