Skip to main content
Glama
rafadepaula

@rafadepaula/clickup-mcp

by rafadepaula

clickup_create_reminder

Create a personal reminder in ClickUp by providing a title and due date, with optional details and workspace selection. Use it to schedule timely follow-ups in your user timezone.

Instructions

Create a personal reminder in your ClickUp workspace. Requires title and due_date (YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format, uses your timezone).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesTitle for the reminder. Ask the user what they want to be reminded about.
due_dateYesDue date in YYYY-MM-DD format or date-time in YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format (e.g., '2025-12-31' or '2025-12-31 14:30'). Uses your user timezone.
descriptionNoOptional description with additional details for the reminder.
workspace_idNoWorkspace ID (digits only). Only needed when you have multiple workspaces.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It usefully notes that this is a personal reminder and explains timezone handling, but it omits permissions, what the created reminder looks like, and any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with no wasted wording. Required fields and formatting constraints are front-loaded for quick parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create-reminder tool with a fully described schema and no output schema, the description covers the essentials needed to call it correctly. Minor gaps remain around return behavior and optional parameters, but the schema fills those in.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all four parameters thoroughly. The description reinforces the required fields and date format but adds little beyond the schema and does not cover optional parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: create a personal reminder in the ClickUp workspace. The 'personal' qualifier helps distinguish it from task creation, though it does not explicitly name sibling tools like clickup_create_task or clickup_update_reminder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides prerequisite guidance by naming required title and due_date fields and giving date/time formats. It does not state when to use this instead of creating a task, searching reminders, or updating an existing reminder.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools