Skip to main content
Glama
rafadepaula

@rafadepaula/clickup-mcp

by rafadepaula

Related Servers

Alternatives to @rafadepaula/clickup-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 61 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct ClickUp resources, but several boundaries are fuzzy: create_list vs create_list_in_folder, attach_task_file vs request_attachment_upload, get_task_comments vs get_threaded_comments, and search vs filter_tasks all require careful reading. The deprecated clickup_create_task_comment alongside clickup_create_comment adds avoidable confusion, and member resolution is split across get_workspace_members, find_member_by_name, and resolve_assignees.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names overwhelmingly follow clickup_verb_noun in snake_case, which is predictable and readable. Minor deviations exist, such as find_member_by_name and resolve_assignees using different verbs, plus the legacy clickup_create_task_comment, but the overall convention is stable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 61 tools, the surface is very heavy for an agent to navigate reliably, exceeding the 25-tool threshold where selection errors become likely. ClickUp is broad, but the count includes deprecated tools and generic operator indirection, making the set feel overgrown rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    Core task, comment, list, folder, document, chat, time-tracking, reminder, tag, dependency, and attachment workflows are covered. However, obvious lifecycle gaps remain for a ClickUp server: no dedicated space creation/update/delete, no folder/list deletion, no document/page deletion, and limited time-entry management. The generic execute_operator may fill some gaps, but only when enabled, so the dedicated tool surface is notably incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues