Skip to main content
Glama
pre170

VoltWise MCP Server

by pre170

Related Servers

Alternatives to VoltWise MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to physical devices via MCP, enabling LLMs to reason about sensor data, perform cross-device correlation, and interpret anomalies.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables a persistent home world model with device graph, acoustic incident detection, and proactive maintenance proposals via MCP tools and server-sent events.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to inspect multi-modal IoT telemetry and query safety policies, then dispatch actuator commands through typed MCP tools that enforce deterministic safety interlocks and record a tamper-evident SHA-256 chained audit trail. This lets automated agents control building hardware without violating safety invariants, while rejecting cross-sensor false alarms and cutting redundant telemetry and token usage.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables smart home automation via MCP with human-in-the-loop approval gates, providing device discovery, state queries, policy checks, and proposal-based execution of actions and scenes that only proceed after explicit user confirmation, with full audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safe, step-by-step troubleshooting of home technology issues, with reversible checks, safety validation, and personalized support plans over MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a unified MCP interface for smart home automation, enabling device discovery, state management, energy optimization, and policy-aware plan validation across multiple home automation protocols.
      20
      Mozilla Public 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct analytical tasks, but three tools cluster around device control/verification: power_control_device, power_turn_on_and_verify, and power_run_diagnostic all involve turning on and validating a device, with the latter two appearing as narrower subsets of the first. An agent may struggle to pick between them, though the tariff/forecast/explain tools are clearly separated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same power_ prefix followed by a snake_case verb_noun phrase (power_control_device, power_compare_periods, power_forecast_bill), giving a highly predictable, uniform pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct energy-management capability (control, diagnostics, comparison, explanation, tariff, forecast, load impact, suggestions). The set is scoped tightly with no filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full monitoring-to-action lifecycle including control, diagnostics, analysis, billing projection, and recommendations. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit device discovery/listing or standalone scheduling tool, but core workflows are reachable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues