Skip to main content
Glama

šŸ›”ļø Edge-Cloud AIoT Sentinel (aiot-mcp-agent)

Author: Benalia Meriem (mi.benalia@gmail.com)
Specialization: Edge AI, IoT Systems, and Large Language Models
Academic Report: report/aiot_sentinel_report.tex | šŸ“„ Download Compiled PDF

Hierarchical Edge-Cloud AIoT Architecture with FastMCP, Multi-Modal Telemetry Ingestion, and Gated SLM Reasoning.
Built as a thesis-grade and portfolio-grade engineering project demonstrating modern AIoT, edge computing trade-offs, and deterministic agent safety.


šŸ“Œ Executive Summary & Research Questions

Deploying Large Language Models directly on raw IoT sensor streams creates two catastrophic engineering failures:

  1. Network & Token Flooding: Streaming high-frequency sensor floats (temperature, humidity, CO2, dB) consumes massive bandwidth and cloud token budgets on static, nominal data.

  2. Hallucinatory Actuator Hazards: Unchecked LLMs can dispatch dangerous commands to physical hardware (e.g., shutting down HVAC during thermal runaway, or disabling ventilation during chemical gas leaks).

šŸŽÆ Primary Research Questions (RQs)

  • RQ1 (Data Efficiency & Telemetry Gating): To what degree can on-device event-triggered deadband and rate-of-rise gradient filtering suppress redundant high-frequency IoT telemetry and LLM token overhead without attenuating critical transient anomaly transitions?

  • RQ2 (Deterministic Actuation Safety): Can a standardized protocol gateway (Model Context Protocol) enforcing pre-actuation deterministic interlocks eliminate safety invariant violations when probabilistic language models control physical actuators?

  • RQ3 (Latency & Multi-Modal Reasoning Trade-off): How does a tiered architecture combining edge event filtering with compact local Small Language Models (SLMs) perform relative to static heuristic baselines and monolithic cloud streaming in decision latency, cross-sensor false alarm rejection, and resource efficiency?

AIoT Sentinel solves these challenges with a three-tier hierarchical architecture:

  • Tier 1 (Physical Edge / TinyML Gate): Lightweight deadband & finite-difference rate-of-rise gradient filtering that eliminates 90.0% of redundant telemetry while deterministically catching critical edge transitions.

  • Tier 2 (FastMCP Gateway & Safety Interlocks): A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing typed tools, tamper-evident SHA-256 chained audit trails, and deterministic invariant checks (ISO-50001 building codes).

  • Tier 3 (Gated SLM Agent): Correlates multi-modal sensor signals (thermal, acoustic, gas, optical, contact) to discern genuine threats from false alarms.


Related MCP server: Proofpane

šŸ›ļø System Architecture

System Architecture

[ ESP32 Sensor Fleet ] (DHT22, MQ-135, PIR, Acoustic, Reed Contact)
          │
          ā–¼  (Raw Telemetry Stream)
ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”
│ Tier 1: TinyML Edge Filter                             │
│ • Deadband thresholding (Δx ≥ δ)        │
│ • Rate-of-rise gradient detection (dx/dt ≥ γ) │
│ • Periodic heartbeat synchronization                  │
│ ──> Discards 90.0% redundant nominal samples           │
ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜
          │ (Escalated Event Packets Only)
          ā–¼
ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”
│ Tier 2: FastMCP Gateway (Model Context Protocol)       │
│ • get_room_state(room_id)                              │
│ • query_safety_policy(domain)                          │
│ • execute_actuator_action(...)                         │
│   ā”œā”€ā”€> [ Deterministic Safety Interlock Gate ]         │
│   └──> [ Tamper-evident SHA-256 Chained Audit Trail ]  │
ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜
          ā–²
          │ Tool Calls & Safety Justifications
          ā–¼
ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”
│ Tier 3: Multi-Modal SLM Reasoner (Qwen2.5 / Edge SLM)  │
│ • Cross-sensor consensus reasoning                     │
│ • False alarm rejection (e.g. transient solar heating) │
│ • Multi-stage disaster mitigation planning             │
ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜

šŸ“Š Empirical Head-to-Head Benchmark

Evaluated over 25 continuous temporal scenarios (1,500 total ticks / 9,000 multi-sensor observations) including thermal runaway, chemical gas leaks, after-hours intrusion, HVAC energy waste, and transient solar glare:

Architecture

Decision Accuracy

Safety Invariant Violations

Packets Transmitted

Bandwidth Saved

Avg Decision Latency

Total Tokens

Static Heuristics (Rule-based)

100.0%

2

9,000

0.0%

3.75 ms

0

Unfiltered Cloud LLM (Raw Stream)

92.0%

1

9,000

0.0%

485.00 ms

63,000

Hierarchical AIoT Sentinel (Ours)

100.0%

0

900

90.0%

21.11 ms

680

Key Empirical Findings:

  • Bandwidth & Token Efficiency: The edge filtering layer reduces transmitted telemetry packets by 90.0% and slashes token consumption by 92Ɨ (from 63,000 down to 680 tokens) with zero missed emergency anomalies.

  • Deterministic Zero-Violation Safety: While naive LLMs occasionally dispatch hazardous commands due to phrasing nuance, the FastMCP safety gate achieved 0 safety violations.

  • Edge Latency: Local SLM actuation completed in 21.11 ms, approximately 23Ɨ faster than round-trip cloud LLM streaming.


šŸ“ˆ Visual Benchmark Reports

Multi-Modal Telemetry & Edge Detection

Telemetry Stream

TinyML Bandwidth Reduction by Sensor Modality

Compression Breakdown

Head-to-Head Metrics Comparison

Benchmark Metrics

Latency vs Token Cost Trade-off (Pareto Frontier)

Pareto Frontier


šŸ› ļø Repository Layout

aiot-mcp-agent/
ā”œā”€ā”€ src/aiot/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ simulator/
│   │   └── virtual_fleet.py       # Multi-room ESP32 telemetry simulator & AR(1) drift
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ edge_filter/
│   │   └── tiny_filter.py         # TinyML deadband filter & rate-of-rise gradient gate
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ mcp/
│   │   └── server.py              # FastMCP Server + JSON-RPC 2.0 + SHA-256 audit log
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ agent/
│   │   └── reasoner.py            # Multi-modal SLM correlation & decision agent
│   └── benchmark/
│       └── eval_harness.py        # 25-scenario continuous temporal evaluation suite
ā”œā”€ā”€ tests/                         # Full Pytest test suite (11/11 passing in 0.39s)
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ test_simulator.py
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ test_edge_filter.py
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ test_mcp_server.py
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ test_agent.py
│   └── test_benchmark.py
ā”œā”€ā”€ report/
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ aiot_sentinel_report.tex   # Formal academic IEEE-style paper (Author: Benalia Meriem)
│   ā”œā”€ā”€ aiot_sentinel_report.pdf   # Compiled publication-ready PDF report
│   └── figures/                   # High-res publication charts (300 DPI)
ā”œā”€ā”€ results/                       # Benchmark outputs (JSON and Markdown)
ā”œā”€ā”€ dashboard.py                   # Interactive Streamlit telemetry & live agent console
ā”œā”€ā”€ pyproject.toml
└── requirements.txt

šŸš€ Quickstart & Reproducibility

1. Installation

git clone https://github.com/Anish-Guntreddi/aiot-mcp-agent.git
cd aiot-mcp-agent
pip install -r requirements.txt
pip install -e .

2. Run Test Suite

pytest tests/ -v

3. Run Empirical Benchmark

python -m aiot.benchmark.eval_harness

4. Launch Live Streamlit Console

streamlit run dashboard.py

šŸ”¬ Hardware Deployment Guide (ESP32-S3 / MicroPython)

To bind this software gateway to physical hardware, flash the following snippet onto an ESP32-S3 board with a DHT22 and MQ-135 sensor:

# firmware/main.py (MicroPython for ESP32-S3)
import time, ujson, urequests
from machine import Pin, ADC

SERVER_URL = "http://<GATEWAY_IP>:8000/telemetry"
LAST_TEMP = 0.0

def read_and_filter():
    global LAST_TEMP
    # Read hardware sensor...
    current_temp = 22.4 
    if abs(current_temp - LAST_TEMP) >= 0.5 or current_temp > 40.0:
        payload = {"device_id": "esp32_01", "room_id": "server_room_a", "sensor": "temperature_c", "value": current_temp}
        urequests.post(SERVER_URL, json=payload)
        LAST_TEMP = current_temp

while True:
    read_and_filter()
    time.sleep(1)

šŸ“œ Citation & Academic Credit

If you use this work in academic research or engineering evaluations, please cite:

@article{benalia2026aiot,
  title={Hierarchical Edge-Cloud AIoT Architecture: Integrating TinyML Gating, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and Gated SLM Reasoning for Safety-Critical Facilities},
  author={Benalia, Meriem},
  journal={Department of Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence},
  year={2026}
}

šŸ“œ License

MIT License. Authored by Benalia Meriem (2026).

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A governance proxy for AI tools — every MCP/agent tool call is policy-gated, secret-redacted, and written to a hash-chained, offline-verifiable audit trail.
    13
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Governed MCP gateway that lets AI agents call tools with policy enforcement, prompt-injection screening, a kill-switch, and tamper-evident signed audit logs.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that lets AI agents interact with IP cameras via ONVIF/VAPIX, with fail-closed per-agent policy gates and hash-chained signed audit receipts.
    1
    MIT