thincms_get_sequence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It indicates a read operation ('Get') but does not explicitly state it is read-only or side-effect-free. The parameter confirmProductionWrite is for writes but is ignored for GET, which could be clarified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence (7 words) that is front-loaded and contains no filler. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get tool with no output schema, the description is mostly complete: it states the resource and what is included. However, it could be slightly more complete by noting the read-only nature or that it respects the active site, though the schema covers the parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema; the phrase 'including its steps' does not explain individual parameters. The schema already provides detailed descriptions for siteId and confirmProductionWrite.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('sequence'), the identifier ('by ID'), and includes what additional data is returned ('including its steps'). This differentiates it from sibling tools like thincms_list_sequences (lists all) and thincms_create_sequence (creates).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The use case is implied (retrieve a specific sequence by ID), but no mention of when not to use it or alternative tools for listing (e.g., thincms_list_sequences).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.