thincms_analytics_summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It correctly implies a read-only operation ('Get') and lists the data returned. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, authorization requirements, or idempotency. For a simple read operation, the description is adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of two sentences that front-load the purpose and key parameters. It is efficient and free of unnecessary words, though it could be slightly more structured (e.g., separating period options explicitly).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the absence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the returned metrics and period options. It does not mention the optional siteId or confirmProductionWrite, but those are well-documented in the schema. Overall, the description is complete for a straightforward analytics summary tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to compensate heavily. It adds value by listing the metrics returned (not in schema) but does not elaborate on the period or siteId beyond what the schema descriptions already provide. The description is neutral; it neither adds nor detracts from the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves an analytics summary with specific metrics (total views, unique visitors, top page, views today) and period options (7d, 30d, 90d). The verb 'Get' and resource 'analytics summary' are precise, and it distinguishes from sibling analytics tools like thincms_analytics_top_pages and thincms_analytics_trend.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use the tool (to get summary analytics) but does not explicitly state when not to use it or compare it to sibling analytics tools. While the metrics listed help differentiate, it lacks explicit guidance on alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.