spraay_xrp_batch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds cost transparency ($0.02 per call) beyond what annotations provide. However, it lacks details on side effects, reversibility, or required permissions. Annotations already indicate non-read-only and non-idempotent, so the description adds moderate value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (two sentences) and front-loaded with purpose, but it omits critical details. It is concise but not sufficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema existing, the description fails to explain prerequisites, parameter formats, or the payment process itself. An agent would not know how to construct valid recipients and amounts arrays.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema descriptions are tautological ('amounts parameter', etc.), and the description only says 'Provide the listed fields as typed arguments' without explaining what each parameter means or expects. No enhancement over schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'XRP batch payments', which identifies the specific verb and resource. It is distinguishable from siblings by name and chain, but no explicit differentiation is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like spraay_batch_execute or spraay_xrp_estimate. The cost mention is a use condition, but no exclusivity or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.