spraay_solana_helius_asset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true. The description adds the cost ($0.002 USDC per call) and a note to pass fields as typed arguments, which provides some additional behavioral context beyond the annotations. No contradictions are present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and mostly concise, consisting of three clauses. However, the first clause 'Helius DAS single asset' is not a full sentence and could be clearer. It efficiently conveys cost and read-only status without unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description need not explain return values. The tool is simple with one parameter. However, the description does not elaborate on what constitutes a 'single asset' (e.g., NFT or token) or any error conditions. It is adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'id' has a trivial schema description ('id parameter'). Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The tool description does not add any extra semantic meaning to the parameter beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Helius DAS single asset' and 'Read-only', which implies retrieving a single asset. However, it does not explicitly use a verb like 'Get' or 'Retrieve', and the phrasing is somewhat fragmented. The name and context distinguish it from sibling tools like spraay_solana_helius_assets_by_owner.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions cost and read-only nature but does not explicitly state that it should be used when a single asset ID is known, nor does it mention any conditions or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.