spraay_solana_helius_assets_by_owner

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states 'Read-only' and mentions cost, adding value beyond annotations (readOnlyHint and openWorldHint). No contradictions. Could disclose more about pagination or limits, but sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences, front-loaded with purpose and cost. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given existence of output schema, description is adequate but minimal. It doesn't explain that it returns a list of assets for a given owner, but the tool name implies that. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions are minimal ('page parameter', 'limit parameter', 'owner parameter'). The description adds no additional meaning, only repeating to pass fields as typed arguments. With schema coverage 100%, it relies on weak param descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Helius DAS assets' and the tool name implies assets by owner, which is clear enough. However, it doesn't explicitly define what 'assets' means (e.g., NFTs, tokens) or how it differs from the sibling 'spraay_solana_helius_asset'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'spraay_solana_helius_asset'. The description only says 'Pass the listed fields directly as typed arguments,' which is not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.