spraay_robots_complete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, etc. The description adds 'Free to call' but does not disclose other behavioral traits like side effects or state changes beyond what annotations provide. This is adequate but not enhanced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences, front-loading the purpose. Every part is useful with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and output schema, the description is minimal. It explains how to call it but does not clarify what constitutes a 'request payload' or prerequisite conditions (e.g., an active task). Lacks some context for a new agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'body' described as 'JSON request body'. The description adds 'Pass the request payload as a JSON string via the body argument', reinforcing the schema but not significantly adding new semantic meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Report Task Complete (RTP)', which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like spraay_robots_list, spraay_robots_status, etc., by focusing on completion rather than other robot operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Free to call' but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like spraay_robots_task or other completion mechanisms. It lacks context on prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.