passgage_create_working_day

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely says 'Create a new working_day' without mentioning side effects, required authentication, return format, or any consequences of misuse. This is a mutation tool, so the lack of transparency is a serious gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence and front-loaded, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It omits critical information, so its brevity is counterproductive. An agent would need far more detail to invoke the tool correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create operation with no output schema, no annotations, and an opaque parameter object, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain what a working_day is, what data to provide, or what will happen. The agent cannot reliably use this tool based on the information given.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'data' is described as 'The data for creating the working_day', which is essentially circular and adds no meaning beyond the schema's placeholder. The schema allows arbitrary additional properties, but neither the schema nor the description explains what fields are expected. The description fails to compensate for this ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a new working_day', which is a direct restatement of the tool name and adds no new information. It does not distinguish this tool from the many other create_* sibling tools, so it functions as a tautology rather than a meaningful purpose statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or why an agent might choose this over related tools. The description leaves the agent without any decision-making information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.