Reorder Link In Bio Links

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag this as destructive and non-readOnly, so the safety bar is partly met. The description reinforces the full-replacement semantic ('every link id... once each'), which hints that an incomplete list has consequences, but it never states what happens to omitted ids and never mentions the dry_run escape hatch, leaving meaningful behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One tightly written sentence with no waste, front-loading the action and the resource before the ordering rule. Nothing could be cut without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation with annotations covering safety and a fully documented schema, the description is adequate but thin. It omits what happens when ids are missing or duplicated and does not surface dry_run as a recommended pre-flight step, which is the kind of guidance an agent needs before a destructive reorder.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters are documented in structured form. The description adds only the provenance of ids (from get_link_in_bio); it says nothing about domain or dry_run, so baseline 3 is right.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Reorder') applied to a specific resource ('a Link in Bio page') and identifies the ordering payload. It is clearly separable from siblings like edit_link_in_bio_link or update_link_in_bio_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear usage context by naming get_link_in_bio as the source of the ids, which tells the agent the prerequisite read step. It does not explicitly contrast with edit_link_in_bio_link, but the constraint that the list must be complete and each id appear once strongly frames when this tool applies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.