Skip to main content
Glama
Official Porkbun MCP Server

Official Porkbun MCP Server

Delete Wordpress Backup

delete_wordpress_backup
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete an on-demand Cloud for WordPress backup by ID from list_wordpress_backups. Automatic backups cannot be removed, so confirm with the user first.

Instructions

Delete an on-demand backup of a Cloud for WordPress site by id (from list_wordpress_backups). Automatic backups cannot be deleted. Confirm with the user first.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesBackup id from list_wordpress_backups.
domainYesDomain of the Cloud for WordPress site, e.g. `example.com`.
dry_runNoValidate and preview without changing anything.
stagingNotrue: act on the site's staging copy instead of the live site.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.59.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the safety profile is known. The description adds meaningful context beyond annotations by limiting deletion to on-demand backups and requiring user confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, leading with the action and target before stating the key restriction and confirmation requirement. Every sentence adds useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete operation with full schema descriptions and annotations covering the safety profile, the description supplies the important extra operational context: source of id, exclusion of automatic backups, and confirmation requirement. No output schema exists, and none is needed here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents id, domain, dry_run, and staging. The description reinforces that id comes from list_wordpress_backups but adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: delete an on-demand backup of a Cloud for WordPress site. It also names the identifier source and explicitly excludes automatic backups, which clearly distinguishes this from backup listing, creation, and restoration tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives useful operational guidance: use an id from list_wordpress_backups, automatic backups cannot be deleted, and the user should confirm first. It does not explicitly mention alternative tools such as restore_wordpress_backup, but the usage constraints are otherwise clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools