Skip to main content
Glama

Server Quality Checklist

67%
Profile completionA complete profile improves this server's visibility in search results.
  • Latest release: v1.0.1

  • Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, though analyze_server and compare_to_baseline both perform explanatory analysis of deviations, which could cause brief hesitation. snapshot vs analyze_server clearly separates raw collection from analysis.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (analyze_server, get_history, record_baseline, compare_to_baseline). snapshot stands alone without a verb prefix, though it functions as a verb in context—minor deviation but readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is ideal for this focused scope: baseline lifecycle (record, compare), historical retrieval, real-time analysis, and raw capture. Each serves a specific step in the monitoring workflow without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the core monitoring lifecycle: establishing baselines, recording current state, historical lookup, and comparative analysis. Minor gaps exist (no list_baselines or delete_baseline), but agents can work around these.

  • Average 3.2/5 across 4 of 5 tools scored.

    See the Tool Scores section below for per-tool breakdowns.

    • No community issues in the last 6 months
    • No commit activity data available
    • No stable releases found
    • No critical vulnerability alerts
    • No high-severity vulnerability alerts
    • No code scanning findings
    • CI is failing
  • This repository is licensed under MIT License.

  • This repository includes a README.md file.

  • No tool usage detected in the last 30 days. Usage tracking helps demonstrate server value.

    Tip: use the "Try in Browser" feature on the server page to seed initial usage.

  • Add a glama.json file to provide metadata about your server.

  • This server has been verified by its author.

  • Add related servers to improve discoverability.

How to sync the server with GitHub?

Servers are automatically synced at least once per day, but you can also sync manually at any time to instantly update the server profile.

To manually sync the server, click the "Sync Server" button in the MCP server admin interface.

How is the quality score calculated?

The overall quality score combines two components: Tool Definition Quality (70%) and Server Coherence (30%).

Tool Definition Quality measures how well each tool describes itself to AI agents. Every tool is scored 1–5 across six dimensions: Purpose Clarity (25%), Usage Guidelines (20%), Behavioral Transparency (20%), Parameter Semantics (15%), Conciseness & Structure (10%), and Contextual Completeness (10%). The server-level definition quality score is calculated as 60% mean TDQS + 40% minimum TDQS, so a single poorly described tool pulls the score down.

Server Coherence evaluates how well the tools work together as a set, scoring four dimensions equally: Disambiguation (can agents tell tools apart?), Naming Consistency, Tool Count Appropriateness, and Completeness (are there gaps in the tool surface?).

Tiers are derived from the overall score: A (≥3.5), B (≥3.0), C (≥2.0), D (≥1.0), F (<1.0). B and above is considered passing.

GitHub Badge

Glama performs regular codebase and documentation scans to:

  • Confirm that the MCP server is working as expected.
  • Confirm that there are no obvious security issues.
  • Evaluate tool definition quality.

Our badge communicates server capabilities, safety, and installation instructions.

Card Badge

mcp-infra-lens MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Score Badge

mcp-infra-lens MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/oaslananka/mcp-infra-lens'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server