marketplace_creator_dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since there are no annotations, the description must convey behavioral traits. It does list what the dashboard includes, which suggests a read-only operation, but it does not mention response structure, error handling, rate limits, or any permissions. This is minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first sentence is packed with useful information, and the description is not overly long. The final sentence 'Essential for creators to track their business' is somewhat redundant but not harmful, keeping conciseness score at a 4.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description provides a partial picture by listing dashboard contents. It leaves out response format, data granularity, and differentiation from similar tools, so the completeness is only average.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover both parameters (creatorAddress and periodDays) completely, and the description adds no extra parameter semantics. It doesn't explain how periodDays affects the dashboard output or provide any context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool 'get[s] a comprehensive dashboard for a tool creator' and enumerates specific metrics (revenue trends, top tools, retention, geography, recommendations). This is a specific verb+resource but does not distinguish it from sibling marketplace analytics tools like marketplace_creator_analytics, so it gets a 4 rather than 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Essential for creators to track their business' is a clear usage context for the intended audience. However, the description offers no guidance on when to prefer this tool over sibling analytics tools or any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.