marketplace_creator_analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are entirely absent, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only says 'Get' which implies a read operation, but it does not clarify whether this is read-only, what permissions are required, how 'history' is defined, or any rate limits or response size issues. The description does not go beyond the basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose. It does not waste words, making it concise and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read tool, the description is fairly adequate, but the lack of annotations and output schema means it must explain return values more clearly. The vague mention of 'history' and lack of response structure leave ambiguity. Additionally, with many similar sibling tools, more contextual differentiation would be needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full coverage for the single parameter 'creatorAddress' with a description and pattern. The tool description adds minimal semantic value—it indirectly implies the creator is identified by address but offers no additional context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function with a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('analytics for a tool creator'), and lists key data types (tools, revenue, history). However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools like marketplace_tool_revenue or marketplace_creator_dashboard, which also focus on creator analytics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many similar marketplace analytics tools (e.g., marketplace_tool_revenue, marketplace_stats, marketplace_creator_dashboard). The description does not state any alternative tools or exclusions, making it hard for an agent to select the right tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.