BinanceWalletWithdraw

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It merely rephrases the tool name without mentioning consequences like irreversible fund transfer, network fees, permission requirements, or that this is a real financial operation. The description adds no meaningful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), but this is under-specification rather than appropriate conciseness. For a tool with 10 parameters and high complexity, the description should include more context to be useful. It lacks front-loaded critical information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (10 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the one-line description is grossly inadequate. It does not explain return values, prerequisites, risks, or operational details, making it incomplete for an AI agent to correctly invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all 10 parameters having descriptions. Thus, the baseline is 3. The tool description does not add any extra parameter semantics beyond the schema, so it meets but does not exceed the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Submit a withdraw request' clearly indicates the action (submit) and resource (withdraw request), which is specific enough for a withdrawal tool. However, it does not distinguish between this and sibling tools like BinanceWalletBrokerWithdraw or mention it's a crypto wallet withdrawal, so it lacks full differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., withdraw history, fast switch, or broker withdraw). It simply states the action without providing context about prerequisites, alternatives, or when a withdrawal is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.