BinanceFutureSubOrders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior, but it only states 'retrieves', indicating read-only intent. It omits pagination behavior, response format, or constraints such as requiring an existing algoId, adding little beyond the purpose statement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It efficiently conveys action, resource, scope, and context, and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterized read with a fully documented schema, the description provides sufficient selection context (futures sub-orders by algoId). It lacks prose on pagination and return shape, but the schema covers invocation parameters and the description clearly states what is returned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with per-parameter descriptions, so a baseline of 3 applies. The description adds futures scope and links sub-orders to algoId, but does not enrich page/pageSize/recvWindow beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'retrieves' with a clear resource ('sub-orders associated with a specified algoId') and scope ('USDⓈ-M Contracts in Binance Futures'). This distinguishes it from BinanceSpotSubOrders and algo-order-level tools like BinanceFutureHistoricalAlgoOrder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: pass an algoId to fetch its sub-orders. However, it provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and does not compare with alternative tools like BinanceSpotSubOrders or BinanceFutureCurrentAlgoOpenOrders.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.