BinanceStatisticList

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the burden. 'Retrieve' clearly implies a read-only operation, and the listed output fields give an idea of the response. However, it does not explicitly state that no data is modified, or discuss permissions, rate limits, or error behavior—leaving some ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that leads with the action and resource, then packs in valuable specifics. Every phrase adds meaning with zero filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite lacking an output schema, the description enumerates the key return values (hash rates, valid/invalid units, profit), giving the agent a clear expectation of results. It does not describe potential error scenarios or pagination, but for a read-only stats tool this is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already well-documented in the input schema. The description adds context about the 'specific account' and output metrics, but does not enrich the meaning of individual parameters beyond their schema definitions, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with the specific verb 'Retrieve' and clearly identifies the resource: 'mining statistics for a specific account.' It enumerates exact metrics (hash rates, valid/invalid units, profit), which differentiates it from sibling tools like BinanceAccountList (just lists accounts) or BinanceMiningAccountEarning (focused on earnings).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many mining-related sibling tools (e.g., BinanceHashRateResaleList, BinanceMiningAccountEarning). The description only states what it does without clarifying exclusions or alternative use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.