BinanceGetDualInvestmentProductList

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'Retrieve' and the phrase 'to view details' convey that this is a read-only operation, which is useful given the absence of annotations. However, the description does not disclose other behavioral traits such as pagination behavior, potential empty results, authentication requirements, or any rate-limit considerations, leaving the agent without a full behavioral picture.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly written sentence that front-loads the core action and directly includes the main filtering and output concepts. There is no redundant or unnecessary wording, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema and no annotations, the description does a reasonable job of explaining what the tool returns (APR, strike price, duration, purchase availability) and how the inputs relate. It could be more complete by explicitly stating the response is a paginated list or by pointing to related tools, but the essential information for selection and invocation is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all six parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds some context by stating that invest and exercised coins are used to filter products and that the output includes APR, strike price, duration, and purchase availability, but it does not add meaningful syntax or format details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Retrieve') and identifies the exact resource ('available Dual Investment products'), plus the key filtering dimensions (option type, invest coin, exercised coin). It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like BinanceGetDualInvestmentPositions by focusing on available products rather than user positions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies when to use the tool (when you need to browse available Dual Investments for given coins and option type), but it provides no explicit guidance about when not to use it or how it relates to alternatives like subscribing or checking positions. The context is understandable but lacks exclusions or alternative references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.