Skip to main content
Glama
nic01asFr
by nic01asFr

modify_webhook

Modify an existing Grist webhook by updating its URL, table, event types, memo, or activation status.

Instructions

Modifie un webhook existant.

Prérequis: - list_webhooks: Pour obtenir un webhook_id valide

Args: doc_id: L'ID du document webhook_id: L'ID du webhook à modifier url: Nouvelle URL du webhook (optionnel) table_id: Nouvel ID de table à surveiller (optionnel) event_types: Nouveaux types d'événements à surveiller (optionnel) memo: Nouvelle note descriptive (optionnel) active: État d'activation du webhook (optionnel)

Returns: Dict avec statut et message de l'opération

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNo
memoNo
activeNo
doc_idYes
table_idNo
webhook_idYes
event_typesNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not disclose side effects, authorization needs, or whether updates are partial or full. Lacks behavioral detail beyond basic mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with sections (Prérequis, Args, Returns). Each sentence is concise and relevant. No extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Returns are briefly described as 'Dict avec statut et message'. With an output schema present, this is adequate but lacks error handling or edge-case details. Moderate completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description compensates by explaining each parameter's purpose (e.g., 'Nouvelle URL du webhook (optionnel)'). All 7 parameters are documented with clear meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Modifie un webhook existant' (modify an existing webhook). Verb+resource is explicit, and it distinguishes from siblings like create_webhook, delete_webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Lists prerequisite: use list_webhooks to get a valid webhook_id. Provides clear context for when to use this tool, but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nic01asFr/mcp-server-grist'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server