Get scheduled EV assessment by ID

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the safety profile is established. The description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., error handling, required existence of the ID), but it does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, the sentence is largely redundant with the title and does not earn its place by adding value, making it under-informative rather than effectively concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with no output schema, the description fails to provide any details about the return value or behavior. The tool appears functional but the agent is left without expectations for response format or potential errors, making the context incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter, schedule_id, with no description and schema coverage of 0%. The description fails to explain that schedule_id identifies the scheduled assessment or how it is used, relying entirely on the parameter name's self-explanatory nature.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a specific scheduled EV assessment' merely restates the title 'Get scheduled EV assessment by ID' with 'specific' replacing 'by ID'. It adds no new distinguishing details and fails to differentiate from sibling tools like get/list operations for other resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as cymulate_ev_scheduled_list or cymulate_ev_scheduled_update. The description gives no context for appropriate invocation, leaving the agent to infer from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.