Get EV resource by ID

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly and idempotent behavior, and the description adds no further behavioral context such as return format, error handling, or permissions. It merely restates the action without disclosing additional traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, simple sentence that directly states the operation. It is extremely concise with no unnecessary words, and every part is meaningful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter read operation with readOnly/idempotent annotations, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks any context about expected output or behavior when the resource is not found, and provides no differentiation from sibling get tools. It is sufficient but not rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% because the description does not mention resource_id. Although the schema provides the name and type, the description fails to compensate for the low coverage by explaining the parameter's role or any contextual semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb (Get) and resource (EV resource), and 'a specific' implies retrieval by a unique identifier, distinguishing it from list operations. However, it does not explicitly say 'by ID' in the description, only in the title, so it slightly misses full clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like cymulate_ev_resources_list or cymulate_ev_resources_get_filters. It does not mention alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.