Create validation template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the description doesn't need to restate those. However, it adds no behavioral context beyond a basic create operation—no mention of side effects, required permissions, or what the created template entails. The description is effectively a restatement of the title with a context qualifier.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and to the point, with no unnecessary words. However, it adds little value over the title, and the 'in Exposure Analytics' qualifier is the only substantive addition. It is concise but not informative enough to earn full marks.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has a complex free-form payload, no output schema, and no parameter guidance, the description is severely incomplete. The agent gets no help on what constitutes a valid template or how the payload should be structured, making the tool almost unusable from the description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the single 'payload' parameter is a free-form object with no structure described. The description provides zero information about what the payload should contain, making it impossible for the agent to construct a valid request without external knowledge.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('validation template'), and adds the context 'in Exposure Analytics', which helps distinguish it from other template creation tools. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from similar sibling tools like cymulate_ev_templates_create or cymulate_ev_smart_templates_create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or typical use cases. The description only states what the tool does, leaving the agent to infer usage context from the name and title.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.