Local SEO Data
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Local SEO Data
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects a Google Business Profile to AI assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Claude Code so users can query local search and Maps performance, track keywords, and monitor reviews through natural language. It also supports write actions for replying to reviews, publishing local posts, and managing photos and menus, with per-account read-only or read-and-write controls.4MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform comprehensive SEO and GEO measurements, including site audits, keyword research, ranking tracking, and brand visibility analysis across search engines and generative AI platforms.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to analyze a business's Google Maps visibility, compare it with local competitors, and scan an area for prioritized improvement opportunities through SerpApi-backed tools.MIT

georanker-seo-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search Google SERPs, track rankings across locations, run Lighthouse SEO audits, find broken internal links, analyze backlinks, and get keyword volume data through a hosted service.15182 npmMIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to diagnose and fix technical SEO, content, and generative engine optimization issues by providing 72 tools that integrate Google Search Console, Google Analytics 4, PageSpeed Insights, structured data, llms.txt, WordPress, and GitHub.7212 npm18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to audit any website's SEO with 39 tools (12 free, no account required), generate white-label client reports, and manage content at scale through natural conversation. It covers SEO scoring, meta tags, page speed, schema validation, keyword gaps, Google Search Console traffic, AI bot visibility, backlinks, and publishing to CMS platforms.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 53 tools
The descriptions work hard to separate overlapping tools, but with 53 tools there are several clusters where boundaries blur: local_pack vs maps vs local_finder vs business_listings, and ai_overview vs ai_mode vs ai_scraper vs ai_llm_response vs ai_sample. Keyword tools (search_volume, keyword_overview, keyword_suggestions, related_keywords, keywords_for_site, keyword_trends) are distinguishable in principle but easy to misselect without careful reading.
Names are consistently lower-case snake_case, and useful prefix families (ai_, keyword_, backlink_, geogrid_, apple_, bing_) make related tools easy to scan. The convention is mostly noun-first with a few verb-first names like get_balance and history_get, so it is predictable but not a strict verb_noun pattern.
At 53 tools the surface is far above the typical 3-15 range and is heavy even for a broad local SEO data platform. Many tools represent distinct paid data products, but the set is large enough that agents must navigate substantial overlap and pricing tiers before choosing correctly.
Coverage is very broad: SERP/local pack, Apple/Bing profiles, GBP data, reviews, citations, audits, geogrid ranking, keywords, backlinks, competitor ads, and AI visibility all have dedicated tools. Obvious remaining gaps are mostly adjacent lifecycle features such as scheduled monitoring, alerts, or write actions, which this read-only data API does not appear to target.