wwise_create_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description compensates by detailing the two-step safety, idempotency, undoability, and default handling. It could elaborate on the preview output but still provides substantial behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently cover the core action, safety workflow, defaults, and edge cases without redundancy. Front-loaded with the main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose, modes, default behavior, and scope of operation. Given no output schema, it could specify what the plan mode preview returns, but still provides a solid understanding for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description adds essential meaning to all parameters: explains mode values, token role, prefix default, and object_ids omission. The token's origin from plan mode is implied but not explicit.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates Play events for Sounds that lack one, specifying the naming pattern and default prefix. It distinguishes the tool's unique safety workflow among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains the two-step plan/apply modes and when each is used, and mentions behavior when object_ids is omitted. However, it does not explicitly exclude alternatives or state when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.