Skip to main content
Glama
lazyants
by lazyants

List Volumes

hetzner_list_volumes
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all volumes in a Hetzner Cloud project, with optional filters for name, label, or status to find and inspect storage resources.

Instructions

List all volumes in the project, with optional filtering by name, label, or status.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoFilter by volume name
pageNoPage number
sortNoSort field, e.g. "id:asc" or "name:desc"; pass an array for multiple sort fields
statusNoFilter by volume status
per_pageNoResults per page (max 50)
label_selectorNoLabel filter, e.g. "env=prod,tier=web"

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv3.0.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\"; pass an array for multiple sort fields"
      +}
  2. First observedv2.2.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered without description help. The description adds only the project scope and optional filtering context; it does not disclose pagination behavior, authorization needs, or return format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It states the resource, scope, and optional filters efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity, full schema coverage, and rich annotations, the description is largely complete for a simple list operation. It omits pagination and output shape, but for this read-only list tool those gaps are minor.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every parameter including page, sort, per_page, and label_selector is already documented in the schema. The description mentions name, label, and status filtering, but adds no syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource, 'List all volumes in the project,' and adds scope plus filterable fields. It is clear enough to separate from get/create/delete/update volume siblings, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from the similarly named hetzner_list_volume_actions tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states what the tool does and what filters are available, but gives no guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The filtering mention is parameter-oriented rather than usage-oriented.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools