hetzner-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to hetzner-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for full Hetzner Cloud + Storage API automation. Exposes all official Hetzner operations as MCP tools so AI agents can manage servers, networking, load balancers, firewalls, volumes, DNS zones, and storage boxes from one server.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for the Hetzner Cloud API that enables natural language management of cloud infrastructure. Users can list, create, and modify servers, networks, volumes, and load balancers through MCP-compatible clients.67477 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Hetzner. Enables managing cloud projects, account resources, and dedicated servers, with the entire REST API reachable through a searchable tool catalog.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows language models to manage Hetzner Cloud resources through structured functions, including servers, volumes, firewalls, and SSH keys.30145MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing Hetzner DNS zones and RRSets via the Hetzner Cloud API. It enables listing, creating, updating, deleting, importing/exporting zone files, and managing protection and TTLs from MCP clients.2268 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server for managing Hetzner Cloud infrastructure with two management layers: * Layer 1 — Hetzner Cloud API (35 tools): Server power control, metrics, snapshots, backups, firewalls, DNS zones and records, rescue mode, server rebuild and rescale. Works even when the server OS is unresponsive. * Layer 2 — SSH (25 tools): Service management (systemd), Nginx config and reload,MIT
TDQS
Scored across 185 tools
The tool set is highly systematic but very large; many tools share the same action verb across different resources (e.g., change_*_protection, list_*_actions) and several server power tools (power_off, shutdown, reset, reboot) have subtle distinctions. Descriptions clarify boundaries, but the sheer volume and repeated patterns increase the risk of misselection.
Names consistently use the hetzner_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun structure (e.g., create_server, delete_volume, list_zones). Minor inconsistencies exist: 'lb' is sometimes abbreviated (get_lb_metrics, list_lb_types) while other tools use 'load_balancer', and power actions are verb-only (power_on, reboot).
185 tools is far beyond the recommended 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch, making it impractical for an agent to navigate efficiently despite the API's breadth.
The surface covers servers, storage boxes, DNS, networking, load balancers, and more with full CRUD and action coverage, including edge operations like rescue mode, console access, zonefile import/export, and snapshot plans. No obvious gaps in lifecycle operations.