Skip to main content
Glama
lazyants
by lazyants

List Storage Boxes

hetzner_list_storage_boxes
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all Storage Boxes in a Hetzner Cloud project, with optional filtering by name or labels. Retrieve storage box details for management and monitoring.

Instructions

List all Storage Boxes in the project, with optional filtering by name or labels.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoFilter by name
pageNoPage number
sortNoSort field, e.g. "id:asc" or "name:desc"; pass an array for multiple sort fields
per_pageNoResults per page (max 50)
label_selectorNoLabel filter, e.g. "env=prod,tier=web"

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv3.0.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / description
      Previous value: -"Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\""New value: +"Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\"; pass an array for multiple sort fields"
    • removedInput schema / properties / sort / type
      Removed value: -"string"
  2. Addedv2.3.1

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, openWorld). The description adds the project-scoping constraint, which is useful context. But it doesn't mention pagination behavior, default sort, or result limits despite three params controlling those.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the operation and resource, then the optional refinement. No waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Read-only list tool with annotations covering safety and schema covering all params, so the essentials are present. However, pagination is a central concern for a list tool (max 50 per page) and the description never signals that results are paginated, leaving the agent to infer it from the schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all five params including name, label_selector, page, per_page, and sort with examples. The description's mention of filtering adds no detail beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('List all Storage Boxes') and adds scope ('in the project') plus filtering capability. Distinguishable from siblings like hetzner_get_storage_box (singular) and hetzner_list_storage_box_types, but doesn't explicitly name them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions that filtering is optional but provides no when-to-use context, no guidance on choosing between name vs label_selector filtering, and no routing to sibling tools (e.g., use get_storage_box for a single box).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools