Skip to main content
Glama
lazyants
by lazyants

List Server Actions

hetzner_list_server_actions
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all actions for a specific Hetzner Cloud server, such as power changes and rebuilds, to track operations and troubleshoot issues.

Instructions

List all actions for a specific server, such as power changes and rebuilds.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesServer ID
pageNoPage number
sortNoSort field, e.g. "id:asc" or "name:desc"; pass an array for multiple sort fields
statusNoFilter by action status: "running", "success", or "error"; pass an array for multiple statuses
per_pageNoResults per page (max 50)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv3.0.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / description
      Previous value: -"Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\""New value: +"Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\"; pass an array for multiple sort fields"
    • removedInput schema / properties / sort / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / status / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / status / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by action status: comma-separated list of \"running\", \"success\", \"error\""New value: +"Filter by action status: \"running\", \"success\", or \"error\"; pass an array for multiple statuses"
    • removedInput schema / properties / status / type
      Removed value: -"string"
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv2.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Sort field, e.g. \"id:asc\" or \"name:desc\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / status
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Filter by action status: comma-separated list of \"running\", \"success\", \"error\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. First observedv2.2.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the example action types; it does not say whether results are a historical log, how far back they go, or that the list is paginated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One compact sentence with the resource and scope front-loaded; nothing redundant. It is arguably a touch thin for a five-parameter paginated lister, but it wastes no words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the burden of hinting at what comes back, yet it only names example action types and omits pagination, filtering behaviour, and the relationship to wait_for_action. Adequate for a simple read lister but with visible gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so id, page, sort, status and per_page are already documented in the schema (including sort syntax and status enum values). The description adds no parameter-level detail, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (list) and resource (actions) scoped to a specific server, and gives concrete examples ('power changes and rebuilds'). This scoping implicitly separates it from sibling listers like hetzner_list_network_actions and hetzner_list_load_balancer_actions, though it never names them explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and no mention of related tools such as hetzner_wait_for_action (which polls a single action) or hetzner_get_server. The agent must infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools