sportsdb_get_next_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description provides one behavioral detail: it returns 15 events. However, it does not disclose other important traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or what happens when no events are found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the essential information. No redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not explain the return format (e.g., what fields are in each event). It is adequate for a simple tool but lacks completeness for an agent to fully understand the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter team_id is described in the schema as 'TheSportsDB team ID'. The description adds no further meaning beyond the schema. Schema coverage is 100%, baseline score 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'get', the resource 'next 15 upcoming events', and the scope 'for a team'. It distinguishes itself from siblings like sportsdb_get_last_events which gets past events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for future events but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like sportsdb_get_event_details or sportsdb_get_last_events. No direct guidance on context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.