motogp: Get sessions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, and idempotentHint as true. The description does not add behavioral details beyond observing its read-only nature, which is consistent. Given adequate annotations, this scores a 3.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. First sentence states purpose directly; second sentence provides parameter usage and downstream connection. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Completely describes the tool: it lists sessions for a given event and category, explains how to obtain parameters, and indicates how the output connects to another tool. No output schema needed for this straightforward list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so parameters are already documented. The description adds value by specifying that event_uuid comes from motogp_get_events and category_uuid comes from motogp_get_categories, which is helpful context for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action ('List the sessions') and the resource type with specific examples (practice, qualifying, race). Distinguishes from sibling tools by mentioning it feeds into motogp_get_session_classification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the user to pass eventUuid from motogp_get_events and categoryUuid from motogp_get_categories, providing clear context for where parameters come from. Does not explicitly discuss when not to use, but this is implied by the tool's specific purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.