nhl: Get player game log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, and idempotentHint, covering safety and behavior. The description adds that it returns a 'game-by-game stats log' but doesn't disclose any traits beyond what annotations provide, such as pagination or return format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence of 12 words, immediately front-loading the verb and resource. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With full schema coverage and annotations present, the description is adequate for this simple tool. It clearly states the purpose and scope. Missing output schema is common; the description doesn't need to detail return structure beyond 'game-by-game stats log'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter documented. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it merely restates the season context. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'game-by-game stats log', and the scope 'for an NHL player in a given season'. This is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like nhl_get_player or nhl_get_game_boxscore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., nhl_get_player for profile, nhl_get_game_boxscore for single game). The description implies it's for game logs but lacks when-not-to-use or prerequisite details.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.