Skip to main content
Glama
lacausecrypto

Sports Hub MCP Server

f1: Get qualifying

f1_get_qualifying
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve Formula 1 qualifying session results including Q1, Q2, and Q3 times for a specific season and round.

Instructions

Get Formula 1 qualifying results. Returns Q1/Q2/Q3 times for drivers in a specific qualifying session.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (default 30, max 1000)
roundNoRound number within the season
offsetNoNumber of results to skip for pagination
seasonNoSeason year (e.g. "2024") or "current" (default: "current")
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as read-only, idempotent, and open-world. The description adds that it returns Q1/Q2/Q3 times, but does not disclose behavioral traits like pagination, default parameters, or data freshness beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the key action and resource. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 optional parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but sparse. It does not explain how to specify a session (e.g., via season and round), and it could mention default behavior or that results are for a specific qualifying session.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema already provides; it only describes the output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'get' and the resource 'Formula 1 qualifying results', specifying it returns Q1/Q2/Q3 times for drivers in a specific session. This distinguishes it from siblings like f1_get_race_results or f1_get_lap_times.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. It relies solely on the name and sibling context for differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lacausecrypto/mcp-sports-hub'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server