list_webhooks
Retrieve a paginated list of all webhooks configured for Kula recruiting integrations.
Instructions
List all configured webhooks.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number | |
| limit | No | Items per page |
Retrieve a paginated list of all webhooks configured for Kula recruiting integrations.
List all configured webhooks.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number | |
| limit | No | Items per page |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral traits. It only states 'list', implying read-only, but does not explicitly confirm no side effects, mention pagination, or discuss safety. The lack of annotations makes this a gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is concise, front-loaded with the purpose, and contains no unnecessary words. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so the description should at least hint at the return format (e.g., a list of webhook objects). It does not, leaving the agent to guess. Pagination behavior is implied by parameters but not explained.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%; both page and limit are described in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List all configured webhooks' clearly states the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_webhook, delete_webhook, and get_webhook by focusing on listing all items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance is provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_webhook for a single webhook or list_webhook_events for events.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kula-ai/kula-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server