get_webhook
Retrieve details of a specific webhook by providing its ID to monitor or manage webhook configurations.
Instructions
Get details of a specific webhook.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID |
Retrieve details of a specific webhook by providing its ID to monitor or manage webhook configurations.
Get details of a specific webhook.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'get details' without mentioning read-only nature, side effects, or any behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence with no wasted words, perfectly front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with one parameter, the description is sufficient but lacks context about when to use it relative to listing webhooks. No output schema is provided.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single 'id' parameter described as 'Webhook ID'. The description adds no additional semantics beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it retrieves details for a specific webhook, using a verb-resource structure that distinguishes it from siblings like list_webhooks or delete_webhook.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_webhooks or get_webhook_sample_payload.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kula-ai/kula-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server