Skip to main content
Glama
kinbeg

mcp-kr-controller

by kinbeg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-kr-controller

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • plctap

      ymxc152
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent-PLC MCP Server: auto-detect, probe, read, write and diagnose Modbus TCP / FINS / MELSEC / Siemens S7comm PLCs, with transparent proxy and fault-injection listener.
      15
      29 PyPI
      2
      MIT

    • cx-programmer-mcp

      BlackUppsss
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for editing OMRON CX-Programmer ladder logic projects, supporting sections, rungs, symbols, and program validation via natural language.
      38
      5
      -

    • devpsu-mcp

      JacobBeningo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling B&K Precision and Manson bench power supplies, enabling voltage/current setting, output switching, and power cycling.
      8
      3
      MIT

    • Computer Control MCP

      AB498
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides computer control capabilities including mouse movements, keyboard actions, screenshot capture with OCR, and window management through a unified API.
      167
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes, especially auto_discover and scan_devices which both handle device discovery and registration, and various relay control tools (all_relays_off, group_disconnect, set_relays_by_mask) that can achieve similar outcomes with different scopes. This makes it difficult for an agent to reliably choose the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming patterns are inconsistent: some use verb_noun (setup_connection, scan_devices), others use noun_verb (group_disconnect, all_relays_off), and several are compound or non-standard (momentary_off_on_single, ping_pong). The verb placement and naming style vary considerably.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the count falls in the heavy 16-25 range. While many tools cover distinct relay control features, some convenience wrappers (e.g., all_relays_off, group_disconnect) could likely be consolidated without losing functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers connection management, device discovery, status reading, and a broad range of relay operations (single, group, all, mask, momentary, blink, animation, DI-trigger). Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated device removal or connection update, but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources