load_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose side effects, such as whether loading overwrites the current workout, requires authentication, or has rate limits. Without annotations, the description carries the full burden, but it only states the action without behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence for the purpose and a single line for the parameter. Every sentence is necessary, and no words are wasted. The structure is front-loaded with the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description covers the basic action and parameter, it omits important context such as whether loading a template replaces the current workout, error handling, or file format constraints. The presence of an output schema reduces the need to explain return values, but the missing operational context lowers completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single required string parameter 'path' with 0% description coverage. The description adds clear semantics: 'Path to the YAML file (e.g. "workouts/templates/hyrox-sim.yaml")', providing an example and file type, which significantly aids the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Load') and resource ('a workout from a YAML template file'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_templates (listing) and preview_upload (previewing) by specifying that it loads a file into a workout.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., preview_upload, save_yaml). The description does not mention prerequisites (e.g., whether the file must exist) or any conditions under which loading is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.