Skip to main content
Glama

search_work_packages

Search OpenProject work packages by keyword, project, status, assignee, priority, or date. Filter open items or your assignments, and sort or group results for targeted retrieval.

Instructions

Search work packages by free text, optionally scoped to a project.

Set status to restrict results to an exact OpenProject status name or numeric ID — not a meta-value like 'open'/'closed'. Set open_only=true to return only open (not-closed) work packages. Set assignee_me=true to return only work packages assigned to the current user.

assignee filters by any user (username, id, or "me"). assignee_me takes precedence.

priority filters by priority name or numeric ID (case-insensitive).

Date filters accept YYYY-MM-DD format:

  • created_on/updated_on/due_on: exact date match

  • created_between/updated_between/due_between: inclusive date range [start, end] Cannot specify both _on and _between for the same field.

sort_by accepts a list of sort criteria in format "field:direction" (e.g., ["status:desc", "priority:asc"]). Direction defaults to "asc" if omitted. Common sortable fields: id, subject, status, priority, type, assignee, author, created_at, updated_at, start_date, due_date.

group_by accepts a field name to group results by (e.g., "status", "assignee"). Common groupable fields: status, priority, type, assignee, author, version, category.

select restricts each result row to the given fields (e.g. ["id", "subject", "status"]); an invalid name returns the allowed set. Common fields: id, display_id, subject, type, status, priority, assignee, project, version, parent_id, parent_display_id, start_date, due_date, estimated_time, spent_time, created_at, updated_at, author, category, description, schedule_manually, derived_start_date, derived_due_date, percentage_done, derived_percentage_done, readonly, ignore_non_working_days. parent_display_id is only populated on OpenProject 17.5+ (semantic mode); it stays null on older/classic instances even when parent_id is set.

limit is capped at OPENPROJECT_MAX_PAGE_SIZE (default 50); pass the returned next_offset as the next call's offset to page past the cap. total is the real matching count only when the query is provably restricted to OPENPROJECT_READ_PROJECTS server-side — scope is unrestricted, or an explicit project was given. Otherwise (no project, restricted scope) total falls back to this page's item count, and next_offset/truncated are based on whether this page came back full rather than the server's own total, so nothing here ever reveals how many matches exist in projects you can't see. Page until next_offset is null either way.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
queryYes
due_onNo
offsetNo
selectNo
statusNo
projectNo
sort_byNo
assigneeNo
group_byNo
priorityNo
open_onlyNo
created_onNo
updated_onNo
assignee_meNo
due_betweenNo
created_betweenNo
updated_betweenNo
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It thoroughly discloses behaviors: capping at OPENPROJECT_MAX_PAGE_SIZE, pagination via next_offset, total count behavior based on server-side restrictions, version-specific fields (parent_display_id), and security implications for hidden projects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-organized, grouping related parameters (date filters, sort/group/select). Every sentence adds value, no fluff. It could be slightly more concise by omitting some repeated wording, but the structure is logical and easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 18 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is remarkably complete. It covers all parameters, pagination, response fields, version-specific behavior, and security aspects. It provides enough detail for an agent to use the tool correctly without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does so extensively, explaining every parameter's allowed values, format, precedence, and constraints. Examples of sort_by, group_by, and select fields are given, along with version notes. This fully compensates for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Search work packages by free text, optionally scoped to a project.' It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_work_packages by focusing on search with free text and many filters, while siblings likely list or retrieve specific work packages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides detailed usage guidelines for each parameter, including format requirements (e.g., 'YYYY-MM-DD' for dates), precedence (assignee_me takes precedence), and constraints (cannot specify both _on and _between). It lacks explicit comparison to sibling tools or when-not-to-use, but the parameter details compensate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jtauschl/openproject-ce-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server