Skip to main content
Glama
jtauschl

OpenProject CE MCP

by jtauschl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenProject CE MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • openproject-mcp-and-skills

      chien334
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to interact with OpenProject API v3 for project management, including creating and managing work packages, projects, comments, time entries, boards, and user dashboards.
      13 npm
      MIT

    • LTD MCP

      Eshway
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI agents connect to LTD project workspaces to inspect project health, search and manage tasks, assign owners, and add comments, with scoped tokens and preview-confirm safety for writes.
      2
      MIT

    • OpenProject MCP Server

      Morrisdev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude Desktop to your OpenProject instance, allowing you to manage projects, tasks, and time entries through natural language.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource (types, statuses, priorities, roles, phases, actions) with clear list/get separation, so an agent can tell them apart. A couple of outliers (get_cost_type with no list counterpart, get_github_pull_request which is unrelated to OpenProject's core domain) slightly muddy the surface but remain understandable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 14 tools follow a strict verb_noun pattern using list_* and get_* prefixes (list_types/get_type, list_statuses/get_status, list_priorities/get_priority, etc.). The convention is applied uniformly with no camelCase or stylistic drift.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool maps to a distinct reference-data endpoint. The count is proportionate to the narrow read-only scope the server declares.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is entirely read-only reference data (types, statuses, priorities, roles, phases, actions) with no work package, project, or time-entry operations, which are the core of OpenProject's domain. Even within its own scope there are gaps: get_cost_type has no list counterpart, list_roles has no get_role, and no create/update/delete exists anywhere, creating dead ends for real project workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources