Skip to main content
Glama

b24_catalog_product_update

Update specific fields of a catalog product in Bitrix24 by providing the product ID and a fields object. Modify properties like name, price, or dimensions directly via the REST API.

Instructions

Update a catalog product (catalog.product.update).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesCatalog product id to update.
fieldsYesFields to change.
webhook_urlNoOverride the default incoming webhook for this call (https://<portal>/rest/<user_id>/<token>/). If omitted, uses personal_webhook, then the X-B24-Webhook HTTP header, then the BITRIX_WEBHOOK_URL env default.
personal_webhookNoAct as a specific user (their personal incoming webhook). Takes precedence over webhook_url. Required to write to the portal under that user's permissions.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., side effects, required permissions, or success conditions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one sentence), but it sacrifices informativeness for brevity. It fails to provide any useful details beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with 4 parameters (2 required) and an output schema, the description is insufficient. It lacks information about typical usage, error handling, or what the update entails.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (all parameters described), so baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema, but also does not detract.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially a tautology: 'Update a catalog product (catalog.product.update).' It restates the tool name without adding specificity about what kind of update or which fields can be modified.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like b24_catalog_product_add or b24_catalog_product_list. It lacks context for an AI agent to decide appropriately.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john7ross/BitrixMCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server