Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to BitrixMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A complete MCP server over the Bitrix24 REST API, enabling CRM, tasks, chats, files, calendar, HR, smart processes, mail, telephony, business processes, and events through 30 tools and ~290 actions. Supports incoming webhook or OAuth 2.0 authentication and works over stdio or Streamable HTTP.
      43
      35 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with Bitrix24 REST API, enabling CRUD operations on deals, contacts, companies, users, leads, and tasks, plus analytics and risk assessment.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A secure, self-hosted MCP server for Bitrix24 CRM that enables reading CRM data and performing confirmation-gated writes through schema discovery and OAuth integration.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a REST API and MCP server to interact with Bitrix24 CRM, enabling CRUD operations on entities like deals, leads, contacts, and tasks via natural language.
      4 npm
      13
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A bridge between Claude (MCP) and Bitrix24 CRM/Tasks, enabling natural language interaction with leads, deals, contacts, companies, and tasks via a custom MCP server using incoming webhooks.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are scoped to a clear Bitrix24 domain, but there are several close pairs (catalog.product.list vs crm.product.list, user.get vs user.search, workflow templates vs document templates), and the universal b24_call overlaps with every typed wrapper. Descriptions mostly resolve the ambiguity, but an agent must read carefully before selecting.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case with a consistent b24_ prefix, but the underlying pattern is inconsistent: b24_crm_list/delete/fields sit alongside b24_crm_activity_add, b24_task_get, b24_scrum_sprint_list, and noun-style names like b24_telephony_statistics or b24_group_users. It is readable but not a uniform verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 52 tools, this is far beyond the recommended 3-15 range and above the 50+ extreme threshold. Since b24_call already exposes the entire REST API, many typed wrappers are conveniences that inflate the selection space rather than earn their place.

    Completeness4/5

    The universal b24_call means there are no true dead ends, and b24_list_methods helps discovery. However, the typed layer is uneven: task/calendar updates, CRM add/update, disk upload/list, and several delete operations are absent, so agents must fall back to b24_call for standard lifecycle steps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues