Skip to main content
Glama

b24_calendar_event_delete

Destructive

Permanently delete a calendar event by its ID. Supports custom owner type and webhook for authentication.

Instructions

Delete a calendar event (calendar.event.delete). Irreversible.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesEvent id to delete.
owner_idNoCalendar owner id. Defaults to the acting user (resolved via user.current) for owner_type='user'.
owner_typeNoCalendar owner type: 'user' (default) or 'group'.user
webhook_urlNoOverride the default incoming webhook for this call (https://<portal>/rest/<user_id>/<token>/). If omitted, uses personal_webhook, then the X-B24-Webhook HTTP header, then the BITRIX_WEBHOOK_URL env default.
personal_webhookNoAct as a specific user (their personal incoming webhook). Takes precedence over webhook_url. Required to write to the portal under that user's permissions.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description notes the action is 'Irreversible', which adds context beyond the destructiveHint annotation. However, it does not discuss permissions, cascading effects, or error states.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the core action and irreversibility. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple delete operation and the presence of a full input schema and output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It could benefit from mentioning the required ID parameter or caution about permanent deletion, but is not severely lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters fully. The description adds no additional parameter information, meeting the baseline but providing no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool deletes a calendar event, using the verb 'Delete' and specifying 'calendar event'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like add or list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update or archive. The description does not specify prerequisites or situations where deletion is inappropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/john7ross/BitrixMCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server